Home  |  About us  |  Editorial board  |  Ahead of print  | Current issue  |  Archives  |  Submit article  |  Instructions |  Search  |   Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contacts  |  Login 
  Users Online: 1242Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 123-127

Comparison of good clinical practice compliance and readability ease of the informed consents between observational and interventional clinical studies in the Emirates


1 Department of Academic Affairs-Medical Affairs, Tawam Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine International, Box 15528, Al Ain, UAE
2 Department of Academic Affairs-Medical Affairs; Department of Emergency Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine International, Box 15528, Al Ain, UAE

Correspondence Address:
Satish Chandrasekhar Nair
Department of Academic Affairs-Medical Affairs, Tawam Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine International Affiliate, Box 15528, Al Ain
UAE
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.184815

Rights and Permissions

Background: Expansion of clinical trials activity into emerging regions has raised concerns regarding participant rights and research ethics. Increasing numbers of observational studies are now conducted in developing economies, including the United Arab Emirates. Materials and Methods: This study compares the content of information provided, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline compliance, and readability of informed consent forms (ICFs) for observational compared to interventional studies. Results: GCP compliance for observational studies averaged at 79.5% + 6.8%, significantly (P < 0.001) lower than 92.2 + 5.0 percent for interventional studies. Readability ease and readability-grade level were assessed with Flesch-Kincaid scales. Results indicated higher readability grade-level 12.4 + 0.4 (P < 0.001) and lower readability Flesch-Kincaid reading ease score 35.7 + 3.6 for observational studies, as compared to 10.3 + 1.6 and 47.8 + 7.4 for interventional studies. Conclusion: Mandatory training for investigators is essential to provide readability ease and GCP compliance for the ICFs for the local population.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1889    
    Printed44    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded199    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal