Perspectives in Clinical Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2011  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 129--136

An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital


Chetna K Desai, Geetha Iyer, Jigar Panchal, Samidh Shah, RK Dikshit 
 Department of Pharmacology, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, India

Correspondence Address:
Chetna K Desai
Department of Pharmacology, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad - 380 016
India

Objectives: Spontaneous reporting is an important tool in pharmacovigilance. However, its success depends on cooperative and motivated prescribers. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by prescribers is a common problem. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) regarding ADR reporting among prescribers at the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, to get an insight into the causes of under-reporting of ADRs. Materials and Methods: A pretested KAP questionnaire comprising of 15 questions (knowledge 6, attitude 5, and practice 4) was administered to 436 prescribers. The questionnaires were assessed for their completeness (maximum score 20) and the type of responses regarding ADR reporting. Microsoft Excel worksheet (Microsoft Office 2007) and Chi-Square test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 260 (61%) prescribers completed the questionnaire (mean score of completion 18.04). The response rate of resident doctors (70.7%) was better than consultants (34.5%) (P < 0.001). ADR reporting was considered important by 97.3% of the respondents; primarily for improving patient safety (28.8%) and identifying new ADRs (24.6%). A majority of the respondents opined that they would like to report serious ADRs (56%). However, only 15% of the prescribers had reported ADRs previously. The reasons cited for this were lack of information on where (70%) and how (68%) to report and the lack of access to reporting forms (49.2%). Preferred methods for reporting were e-mail (56%) and personal communication (42%). Conclusion: The prescribers are aware of the ADRs and the importance of their reporting. However, under reporting and lack of knowledge about the reporting system are clearly evident. Creating awareness about ADR reporting and devising means to make it easy and convenient may aid in improving spontaneous reporting.


How to cite this article:
Desai CK, Iyer G, Panchal J, Shah S, Dikshit R K. An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital.Perspect Clin Res 2011;2:129-136


How to cite this URL:
Desai CK, Iyer G, Panchal J, Shah S, Dikshit R K. An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital. Perspect Clin Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 14 ];2:129-136
Available from: http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2011;volume=2;issue=4;spage=129;epage=136;aulast=Desai;type=0