Perspectives in Clinical Research

STATISTICS
Year
: 2015  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 169--170

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance


Priya Ranganathan1, CS Pramesh2, Marc Buyse3 
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 International Drug Development Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium

Correspondence Address:
Priya Ranganathan
Department of Anaesthesiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India

In clinical research, study results, which are statistically significant are often interpreted as being clinically important. While statistical significance indicates the reliability of the study results, clinical significance reflects its impact on clinical practice. The third article in this series exploring pitfalls in statistical analysis clarifies the importance of differentiating between statistical significance and clinical significance.


How to cite this article:
Ranganathan P, Pramesh C S, Buyse M. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance.Perspect Clin Res 2015;6:169-170


How to cite this URL:
Ranganathan P, Pramesh C S, Buyse M. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance. Perspect Clin Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Sep 17 ];6:169-170
Available from: http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2015;volume=6;issue=3;spage=169;epage=170;aulast=Ranganathan;type=0