Home  |  About us  |  Editorial board  |  Ahead of print  | Current issue  |  Archives  |  Submit article  |  Instructions |  Search  |   Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contacts  |  Reader Login
  Users Online: 1084Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
  Citation statistics : Table of Contents
   2019| January-March  | Volume 10 | Issue 1  
    Online since January 24, 2019

 
 
  Archives   Previous Issue   Next Issue   Most popular articles   Most cited articles
 
Hide all abstracts  Show selected abstracts  Export selected to
  Cited Viewed PDF
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
An audit of studies registered retrospectively with the Clinical Trials Registry of India: A one year analysis
Amit R Birajdar, Debdipta Bose, Tushar B Nishandar, Anagha A Shende, Urmila M Thatte, Nithya J Gogtay
January-March 2019, 10(1):26-30
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_163_17  PMID:30834204
Background: The Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) was launched in July 2007 and will enter its tenth year in 2017. While its mission is to encourage prospective trial registration, CTRI does permit retrospective trial registration. Against this backdrop, the present audit was carried out with the primary objective of assessing the nature and extent of trials retrospectively registered with CTRI. Methods: All studies registered in the year 2016 were searched within CTRI using the keyword “CTRI/2016.” The total number of trials registered in that year, their phase, the source of funding and their nature (Interventional or observational; whether postgraduate theses or otherwise, source of funding (pharmaceutical industry/Government of India/Institute Funded), whether prospectively or retrospectively registered were noted. We also tested for the association between the nature of the trial and retrospective registration using the Chi-square test and generated crude odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 1147 studies were registered in 2016, of which 719 (63%) were retrospectively registered. Interventional studies formed the majority of studies at n = 926 (81%), while postgraduate theses constituted half of the studies (384; 53%). Postgraduate theses (relative to all other studies) were twice as likely to be retrospectively registered (cOR 2.4 [1.8, 3.0], p < 0.0001). Studies funded by the pharmaceutical industry were four times more likely to be registered prospectively relative to nonindustry funded studies (cOR 4.4 [3.2, 5.9], p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Given that CTRI will be insisting on prospective registration effective April 1, 2018, and as trial registration is an ethical, scientific and moral imperative, prospective registration must always be done as prerequisite to participant protection.
  1 1,504 162
EDITORIAL
Subject expert committees: Past, present, and future
Amita Bhave, Suresh Menon
January-March 2019, 10(1):1-3
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_196_18  PMID:30834199
  - 1,248 306
LETTERS TO EDITOR
Comments on editorial “Professional medical writing support: The need of the day”
Francesco Chirico, Nicola Magnavita
January-March 2019, 10(1):44-45
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_130_18  PMID:30834209
  - 484 81
Response to letter to the editor – Professional medical writing support: The need of the day
Suhasini Sharma
January-March 2019, 10(1):46-46
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_146_18  PMID:30834210
  - 370 78
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India
Mahesh Ravindra Khairnar, Umesh Wadgave, Sagar Jatish Shah, Swarali Shah, Vardhaman Mulchand Jain, Sagar Kumbhar
January-March 2019, 10(1):9-14
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_141_17  PMID:30834201
Purpose: Plagiarism is a type of research misconduct that consists of copying other's work or ideas without giving them proper credit. The rise of plagiarism cases has become a serious concern in the scientific world. Hence, a cross-sectional survey was carried out to assess the attitude among dental faculty members and postgraduate (PG) students toward plagiarism. Objectives were to compare the attitudes of dental faculty members and PG students toward plagiarism and to analyze the association of attitude toward plagiarism (ATP) with age, gender, and number of publications of the participants. Materials and Methods: ATP was measured using a self-administered questionnaire consisting of two sections; first section consisting of demographic details of the participants and second section consisting of the ATP questionnaire measuring positive attitude, negative attitude, and subjective norms. Ninety faculty members and 126 PG students from four dental institutions participated in the study. The data were analyzed using Chi-square test and linear regression analysis. Results: PG students showed more positive attitude and less negative ATP as compared to faculty members. Positive ATP decreased with increase in age (β = −0.147; P = 0.008), number of publications (β = −0.195; P = 0.001), and from males to females (β = −1.209; P = 0.044) whereas negative ATP increased with age (β =0.093; P = 0.001). Conclusion: The study showed negligence of PG students toward plagiarism which calls for improvement in awareness regarding plagiarism and research education.
  - 1,766 295
An audit of minutes of Subject Expert Committee meetings as a metric to assess the clinical research roadmap of India
Parvan A Shetty, Nithya J Gogtay, Urmila M Thatte
January-March 2019, 10(1):15-19
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_174_17  PMID:30834202
Background: In January 2015, the Drugs Controller General of India approved the formation of 25 Subject Expert Committees [SEC] to aid the office of the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization [CDSCO] with regards to decision making. The present study is an audit of the minutes of the meetings the SECs held over the past three years. Methods: All minutes during the period 1st July 2014 to 31st October 2017 were accessed from the CDSCO website. Applications were classified as those for clinical trials [CT] and those for marketing authorization [MA]. Each application was classified as being approved, amendment requested for or rejected. Results: A total of n = 317 meetings were held over a 40 month period with n = 2616 agenda items. The Oncology/Hematology SEC had the maximum number of meetings at n = 48 [15.1%]. Only n = 2030 [77.6%] were evaluable agenda items. There were 1082 [53%] applications for clinical trials, and 948 [47%] applications for MA with or without a request for a clinical trial waiver[CTW]. Applicants seeking CTW were 5 times more likely to be rejected [for the waiver] relative to those not seeking waivers (cOR 5 [3.8, 7], P <0.001). CTW applications for Oncology were 6.5 times more likely to be granted a waiver (cOR 6.5 [3.5, 11.7], P <0.001). Considerable variability was seen in the minutes. Conclusion: A vast majority of CT applications in the country receive approval, as do a majority of marketing authorization applications. Oncology, vaccine and opthalmology division predominate the approvals. There exists considerable heterogeneity in the minutes. Standardization of these minutes across committees will help add to the existing transparency and give greater insights into the decision-making process.
  - 773 162
Effect of a planned training session on good clinical practice knowledge in research professionals: A pilot study
Kasturi Awatagiri, Durga Gadgil, Sadhana Kannan, Pallavi Rane, Bhavesh Bandekar, Nilam Sawant, Prafulla Parikh, Vedang Murthy
January-March 2019, 10(1):20-25
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_146_17  PMID:30834203
Context: Adherence to good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines by the researcher provides public confidence that the rights, safety and well-being of human participants involved in research are protected. It has been observed that researchers require basic GCP training. Considering this, we had decided to conduct a training session on overview of GCP. Aims: To strengthen the knowledge and awareness regarding GCP. Settings and Design: The design of the study was quasi-experimental one group, pre-test and post-test design and the study was conducted at ACTREC among healthcare professionals at Tata Memorial Centre. Methods and Material: A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data in pre and post-test. A total of 138 participants were participated in the study. The training session was pre-planned which included a lecture followed by the question-answer session. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to assess the effect of the planned teaching programme. Macnemar test was used for item wise comparison of pre and post-test scores. Mann Whitney test was used to determine the significant difference between knowledge scores and selected demographic variables. Results: This study has resulted in overall improvement of knowledge with a median difference of 5 with P-value <0.001. There was a statistically significant improvement of knowledge between pre and post-test of those having GCP training in the past, working group and education. Conclusions: The exercise of holding training program was found to be significant in improving the knowledge base of participants, especially investigators and study coordinators.
  - 934 131
READING BETWEEN THE LINES
Commentary on STOP DIABETES study
Viraj Suvarna, Jignesh Ved
January-March 2019, 10(1):42-43
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_147_18  PMID:30834208
  - 539 85
REGULATORY UPDATE
Indian regulatory update April–October 2018
Amita Bhave, Lakhvinder Singh Batolar
January-March 2019, 10(1):31-33
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_188_18  PMID:30834205
This document provides updates in regulatory requirements regarding conduct of clinical trials in India.
  - 932 145
REVIEW ARTICLE
Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers
Gaurav Anand, Mohit Joshi
January-March 2019, 10(1):4-8
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_31_18  PMID:30834200
Publications in peer-reviewed journals as well as oral and poster presentations for scientific conferences comes under the purview of GPP3 guideline. The GPP3 has kept pace with the changes in publication practices and focusses on every burning aspect of publications. The present paper evaluates the purview of GPP3 guideline in context with the evolving role of medical writer (MW) in the present times. A MW plays an important role to in producing high quality authentic documents. The role of professional MW have previously been emphasised upon in previous versions of GPP guidelines, and have been instrumental in acknowledging role of MWs in medical publications and cementing their existence rather than them being termed as 'ghostwriters'. Additionally the paper focuses on evolving publication and research presentation standards with reference to other guidelines. The paper also focusses on clarity on reimbursements which is in contrast to other Acts (Sunshine Act). Most importantly, the expectations from subsequent guidelines are also discussed which may form basis of subsequent GPP guidelines.
  - 879 362
STATISTICS
Study designs: Part 2 – Descriptive studies
Rakesh Aggarwal, Priya Ranganathan
January-March 2019, 10(1):34-36
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18  PMID:30834206
One of the first steps in planning a research study is the choice of study design. The available study designs are divided broadly into two types – observational and interventional. Of the various observational study designs, the descriptive design is the simplest. It allows the researcher to study and describe the distribution of one or more variables, without regard to any causal or other hypotheses. This article discusses the subtypes of descriptive study design, and their strengths and limitations.
  - 1,647 319
WRITERS WINDOW
How to leverage the language: A guide for medical writers in India
Goraj Desai
January-March 2019, 10(1):37-41
DOI:10.4103/picr.PICR_129_18  PMID:30834207
English, the most widely used and accepted language worldwide, is also the dominant language in scientific writing. To ensure that a publication has a wide reach, it should be written in a simple and concise manner, which requires a good command over the English language. However, this is an area of challenge for most medical writers in India. This article includes tips and tools that will help medical writers overcome these challenges, which will aid in better understanding of the audience and easier publication process.
  - 667 113
  Feedback 
  Subscribe