Home  |  About us  |  Editorial board  |  Ahead of print  | Current issue  |  Archives  |  Submit article  |  Instructions |  Search  |   Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contacts  |  Login 
  Users Online: 467Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 115-120

An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of institutional ethics committee members from eastern India regarding ethics committee functioning and pharmacovigilance activities conducted during clinical trials: A pilot study

1 Consultant Clinical Pharmacologist and Medical Superintendent (Academics, Quality and Research), Peerless Hospitex Hospital And Research Center Limited, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Student of Public Service Management (Hospital & Healthcare), IISWBM (Calcutta University), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Executive, Department of Clinical Research, Peerless Hospitex Hospital And Research Center Limited, West Bengal, India
4 Director, Clinical Research Centre, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Correspondence Address:
Shreya Sikdar
Department of Clinical Research, Peerless Hospitex Hospital And Research Center Limited, Kolkata - 700 094, West Bengal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.134310

Rights and Permissions

Purpose of study: The vital responsibility of Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) members is to ensure the safety of the subjects participating in clinical trials. Hence, it is essential for IEC members to be aware of the common pharmacovigilance strategies followed during clinical trials. However, the information about the knowledge, attitude, and practice of IEC members regarding the pharmacovigilance activities followed during clinical trials is scarce worldwide, especially in India. Hence, this cross-sectional study was designed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of IEC members of 10 hospitals of Kolkata, India. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered, validated questionnaire was conducted among 10 hospitals (five government and five corporate hospitals) in Kolkata conducting active clinical research and having functional Ethics Committees (ECs) in the month of September-November, 2012. An IEC approval was taken for this study. Two reminders were given to all EC members through telephone/e-mail for completion and returning of the forms. The filled in forms were returned to their respective Member Secretaries, from whom authors' collected the forms. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 software and MS-Excel 2007. Categorical data were analyzed using Chi-square test and a P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of the 100 distributed questionnaires, 40 were returned of which 10 were not filled properly. Overall awareness regarding different pharmacovigilance terminologies and activities among EC members from nonmedical background (71.43%) was found to be more than that of the medical members (68.75%), though the figure was not statistically significant. Majority of the members (75%) felt that EC should decide compensation in case of a serious adverse event. Conclusion: The present study signifies that there is a low level of awareness in IEC members of Kolkata regarding pharmacovigilance activities conducted during clinical trials; and, hence the functioning of the ECs to safeguard the safety of patients during clinical trials remains questionable. There is a definite need for immediate intervention in the form of mandatory training hours for EC members about pharmacovigilance activities and reporting timelines to ensure clinical trial s ubject safe t y in the long run.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded389    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal